Evolutionary Model of Labour Market
|
Figure 1. Dynamics of production quantity (R), volume of natural resources and scientific potential, when economy is unreceptive to innovation. Finally, economy stabilises at the level of reproducible resources. |
Healthy increase of parameter A leads to another stable situation in future, when natural resources are exhausted. After the period of digression production rebuilds rapidly and stabilises at the steady grows trend. The fact is that the interchange of the main resources of economic development occurred. The further economic growth is provided by intellectual sphere (See Fig. 2).
Figure 2.Increase in innovation leads to the interchange of the main resources of economic development when natural resources are exhausted. The further economic growth is provided by intellectual sphere. |
Computer experiments with the model makes it possible to reveal the qualitatively different regimes of development and to predict the bifurcation points - the moments, when the system changes its regime of evolution. It shows when it is possible to change the process of development and when the situation becomes irreversible. It also permits us to evaluate the consequences of parameter changes. And finally, it allows us to see the invisible scenarios of development. The nonlinear modelling seems to be reasonable economic analysis because economic development involves changes not only in the level of various variables but in an economy’s structure, that is, changes in the way the economy works.
The initial statement for the analysis of complex systems is that they have different ways of evolution. There are many forms of future organisation (named as attractors) and the set of possible ways to the future (basin of attraction). As a consequence, the final stable goal of the development of complex system is replaced by the tree of opportunities (See Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Bifurcation Tree of Opportunities. |
From synergetic point of view, the process of development is not a planned movement to the purpose, but an iterative process, at each stage of which the choice, determining the way of further development, is executed.
In short, the development of social system as a nonlinear system passes two stages: evolutionary stage and bifurcation. A distinctive feature of the evolutionary stage is the constancy of system quality. This is the period with well-predicted linear changes. But just here the increase of internal nonequilibrium occurs. It is felt as an approach of crisis. The system comes to the point of bifurcation. In this point the evolutionary path of the system is branched out. Synergetically minded economist would evaluate present decision not by comparing present and previous states, but by comparing current state with probable situation under alternative ways of development. So, the future can be seen as the space of opportunities, and present - as an intensive process of choice.
As it was stated above, the characteristic features of labour market of specialists in Russia now are instability and uncertainty. As a complex system labour market is at the point of bifurcation. At present the idea of evolutionary development is very popular in Russia. However the standpoints what must be a push for leaving this point of bifurcation differ very much. It would be soft economic, cultural mechanisms, but it would be rigid political methods.
As to the political influences, it should be noted that political power in Russia traditionally was determinative. Today the following tree of possibilities is considered by Russian specialists (See Fig. 4)3.
Figure 4. Variants of political choice in Russia. |
The choice of one or another way in the point of bifurcation depended on the activity of concrete person. Choice of the President Putin would be determinative. What potential possibilities available today would be in demand in future depends on this choice. It also determines the spectrum of possibilities for self-realization that will open before each specialist. So far the spectrum of possibilities was very narrow. Under the socialism there were largely two possibilities: full conformity with the state will or social rejection. In the last ten years under the conditions of formation of market relations, in general, there were also two alternatives because of severe conditions of physical survival as is clear from social-demographic statistics. Will Russian labour market of specialists have more alternatives, to a large extent, depends on the forthcoming choice of President.
Undoubtedly, economical, cultural, educational influences as the drivers of economic development are more preferable than rigid political methods. They could give more possibilities for economic self-organization and sustainable development.
As mentioned previously, synergetic management implies the transition from one qualitative state to another that better corresponds to the managerial goals. According to synergetics it is possible to change the attractor (future) transforming the basin of attraction (social environment). In other words, future is probabilistic and it is not unique. At the same time it can not be whatever. The task of the state government in the situation of instability is try to save the system stability and at the same time to stimulate the search of new alternatives. Management based on the principle “the stronger the managing efforts the better the result” is suit the systems being in the equilibrium state. If the system is in situation of instability it complies with another laws, the laws of nonlinear dynamics. In nonlinear systems the phenomena, known as resonance, is possible. It means that even slight resonance influence has more effects than strong impacts that is inconsistent with the whole system. In other words, managerial solutions should be aimed not at the resonance with the outmoded traditions. It should be aimed at the stimulation of new social forces activity, new principles of organization, new values that provide the evolution of the society in the changed world.
So, labour market formation should be implemented on the basis of the spectrum of possibilities, opening before the country at given historical moment. Transformation of existing intellectual potential in accordance with the image of future is expected to be done not by rigid management with defined purposes, but by shaping the new canons in the evaluation of intellectual resources. In turn, according to the synergetic methodology, small influences in science, education could influence upon the social evolution more strong, than strong, but not coordinated with the system, influences.
At least, two things are very important: choice of the variant of future economic development and managerial policy. Unfortunately, for many times Russia faced the situation when the chosen goals were not achieved. Moreover the result of economic development was direct opposite to supposed. Maybe, it is because these goals could not be achieved in principle, or because the chosen way of development could not lead to such goals.
Mathematical modelling makes it possible to experiment with the model, not with the real system. This idea has been already formulated as scientific problem. For example, one of the last research project of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, is devoted to the finding of the order parameters - a set of quantities which determine the social dynamics and its stability. These will offer the way to evaluate the possibilities to affect social evolution through small controlling actions - minor changes in educational, scientific, information technologies and related politics. Development of this approach is of great importance for Russia, which is now in a transition state, when non-traditional strategies are of particular value.
In addition, to make the process of economic evolution sustainable the transformations in organizations and management should take place [Merry, 1995]. Novel forms of organization, different organizational cultures and new ways of leadership should be developed. These changes imply, at least, the following transformations:
The fact is that the system changes problems to a great or lesser extent are actual to all countries. Today there are some tendencies at world labour market that qualitatively change the classical concepts of employment, occupation, wealth, etc. New forms of work (e.g. temporary work, unpaid work, voluntary work, self-employment) makes the situation at labour market more flexible, but at the same time more complex and unstable. The impact of new patterns of work shifts the boundaries between work and private life and generate new social problems.
The old approach to find the optimal way of development seems to be fruitless. In the situation when there are many variants of development, maybe, it would be more reasonable to analyse different scenarios and to look for sustainable way of evolution. There is a general feeling that the industrial era has reached a point where it is no longer sustainable. A number of major areas of life, including labour market, are fluctuating near their bifurcation points. These areas are in need of a transformative qualitative change as they have reached the limits of their present form. Perhaps, it is the historical moment when humanity for the first time in its evolution can be aware of evolution and can guide itself into the future.
No doubt, that we are living in a world that is becoming more and more complex. And it is increasingly difficult to cope with a world that daily becomes more complex and uncertain. Despite of many specific differences, one thing is clear that the situation at labour market both in Russia and European countries is increasingly turbulent. All this leads to the same question of how people will be able to live in such a changing world and what possibilities are open to them under these complex conditions.
Generally speaking, the serious problem of our days is the threat of society atomization that comes from the new relationship between independence of individuals and societies and integrity of society in whole. In such a situation the role of values and ethical preferences is of special importance. To some extent, they play the same role in social self-organization as physical laws in nature.
Ayres R.U. Self-organization in Biology and Economics. IIASA. Laxenburg, 1988. - 47 p.
Baumol W.J., Benhabib J. Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989. - N3. - p. 77-105.
Burns T., Stalker G. M. The Management of Innovation. - Tavistock, 1968. – 438 p.
Guastello S. Hysteresis, bifurcation structure and search for the natural rate of unemployment. http://brahma.mscs.mu.edu/CTRNL/unemp.html
Day, Richard H. Complex Economic Dynamics. - Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994. - Volume I. - 309 p.
Day R.H., Wayne S. Ergodic Fluctuations in Deterministic Economic Model // Journal of Economic Behaivor and Organization, 1987. - Vol.8. - p. 339-361.
Iasin E. New Epoch, Old Worries // Questions of Economics, 2001. - N1. (in Russian)
Isomaki, Heikki and Satu - Paivi Kantola. Bifurcations and Chaos in Enveronmental Macroeconomic System // mimeo, Helsinki, University of Technology and University of Turku. - 1995. - 52-61.
Johnson G. Strategic Change and the Management Process. - Blackwell, 1978. – 352 p.
Kapitza S., Kurdyumov S., Malinetskii G. Synergetics and Prediction of the Future. - Moscow: Nauka, 1997. - 285 p.(in Russian)
Knyaseva E., Kurdyumov S. Laws of Evolution and Principles of Co-evolution of Complex Systems. - Moscow: Nauka, 1994. - 236 p. (in Russian)
Magaril S. Civil Responsibility of Intelligentsia // Sociological Studies (Socis). - 2001. - N2. - P. 53. (in Russian)
Malinetskii G. Chaos, Structures, Computer Experiment. - Moscow: Nauka, 1997. - 255 p. (in Russian)
Malinetskii G.”Historical mechanics” and nonlinear dynamics // Phystech J., 1996. - Vol.2.- N2. - p. 74-85.
Malinetskii G. Synergetics, Predictability and Deterministic Chaos, Springer Series in Sinergetics //Springer Verlag, Berlin. - Vol. 66. - p. 75-141.
Merry U. Coping With Uncertainty: Insights From the New Sciences of Chaos, Self-Organization, and Complexity. - Praeger, 1995
Mirowski P. From Mandelbrot to Chaos in Economic Theory // Southern Economic Journal,1990. - N2. - Vol.57. - p. 289-307.
Moiseev N. Mathematical Problems of System Analysis. - Moscow: Nauka, 1981. - 488 p. (in Russian)
Nonaka I. Creating Organizational Order Out of Chaos: Self - Renewal in Japanese Firms // California Management Review. - 1988. -Vol. 30. - Issue 3. - p.57-73.
Petrov A., Pospelov I., Shananin A. Mathematical Modelling in Economics. - Moscow: Energoatonizdat, 1996. - 544 p. (in Russian)
Pugacheva E. Multidisciplinary Approach to Economics // Human Capital and Competition -Works of Irkutsk State University, 2000. - p. 70-79. (in Russian)
Pugacheva E. Synergetic Approach to Higher Education System // Higher Education in Russia. - 1998. - N2. - p. 41-45. (in Russian)
Pugacheva E., Solovienko K. Evolutionary Model of the Labour Market of Specialists // Alma Mater. - 2000. - N6. - p. 34-38. (in Russian)
Pugacheva E., Solovienko K. Higher Education: Some Problems of Self-Organization // Sociological Studies (Socis). - 1999. - N11. - p. 99-101.
Rivkina R.V. What are the Possible Variants of the Future // Social Sciences and Contemporaneity. - 2001. - N1. (in Russian)
Solovienko K., Pugacheva E. Openness and Self-Organization in Higher Education Reform // Alma Mater. - 1998. - N5. - p.3-7. (in Russian)
Thietart, R. A. and Forgues B. Chaos Theory and Organization // Organization Science. - 1995. - Vol.6. - N1, pp. 19-31.
Young T.R., L. Douglas Kiel. Chaos and Management Science: Control, Prediction and Nonlinear Dynamics // Internet
Young T.R. Chaos and the Drama of Social Change: A Metaphysic For Postmodern Science // Internet
Young T.R. Chaos Theory and Human Agency // Internet.
The paper was published in:
|
At full or partial use of data from the «Synergist» site, the reference to the authors and to the site is obligatory. In case of Internet publication an active hyperlink on http://synergist.kiev.ua is obligatory. |